Politics

Highwood UCP board backs leadership review as separatist anger turns toward Danielle Smith

By ·

A grassroots challenge to Danielle Smith’s leadership is beginning to take shape inside the United Conservative Party, with Alberta independence advocate Jeffrey Rath announcing that the Highwood constituency association board has voted to call for a leadership review. The Highwood vote would be an early step rather than an immediate leadership contest: UCP bylaws say a special general meeting must be called when one-quarter of constituency associations pass identical motions, and the party’s governance manual specifically allows that process to be used to trigger a leadership review. Elections Alberta currently lists 87 UCP constituency associations, making the threshold 22 associations — slightly lower than the figure of 23 that has circulated in some discussions. If a review were eventually held and Smith received less than 50 per cent support, party rules would automatically trigger a leadership election.

The emerging challenge is closely tied to growing frustration among some of the UCP’s separatist wing. Rath and other independence organizers have spent months criticizing Smith for supporting Alberta’s continued place in Canada and for the way her government has handled the province’s Oct. 19 referendum. In May, after Smith announced a referendum question offering Albertans a choice between remaining in Canada and beginning a legal process toward separation, Rath called the premier’s position a “betrayal” and said it was time for her to go. Smith responded that separatists should focus on winning the referendum rather than trying to remove her and said she would campaign for Alberta to remain in Canada. More recently, Rath has said the independence movement intends to continue organizing regardless of the referendum result, underscoring the widening gap between Smith and activists who once viewed her sovereignty agenda as a vehicle for advancing their cause.

There is precedent for constituency associations turning dissatisfaction with a UCP leader into a formal internal reckoning. In 2021, 22 riding associations — then one-quarter of the party’s total — invoked the same bylaw mechanism while Jason Kenney was premier, helping force an accelerated leadership-review process that ultimately preceded his resignation the following year. Smith herself survived a scheduled leadership review in November 2024 with 91.5 per cent support, but the political environment inside the party has shifted substantially since then as the separation debate has intensified. For now, Highwood represents only the beginning of a possible process: additional constituency boards would have to adopt the same resolution before the party is compelled to hold a special meeting. Whether that campaign gains enough support will provide an unusually direct measure of how deeply dissatisfaction with Smith has spread from Alberta’s separatist movement into the UCP’s formal grassroots organization