Politics

Corb Lund calls for immediate coal moratorium as former Elections Alberta staff question petition review

By ·

Country musician and rancher Corb Lund is asking the Alberta government to impose an immediate moratorium on new coal development in the Eastern Slopes, arguing no further approvals, expansions or exploration should proceed until an ongoing judicial review and additional environmental assessment work are complete. Lund’s Water Not Coal initiative submitted 207,435 signatures earlier this year; Elections Alberta counted 196,088 as valid before applying its statistical verification process, which produced an estimated 172,088 verified signatures. That left the initiative 5,644 signatures below the 177,732 required to advance under the Citizen Initiative Act. Lund has since asked the Court of King’s Bench to overturn the decision or order Elections Alberta to reconsider it.

The latest dispute centres on an Aug. 6 letter sent to the legislature’s Standing Committee on Legislative Offices by five former Elections Alberta employees — a service centre manager and four supervisors — who resigned during the petition-validation period. The former staff alleged there was insufficient oversight, repeatedly changing procedures, inadequate access to training materials and changes to signature-validation criteria, and said they were excluded from discussions about some of those changes. Lund argues the allegations reinforce his campaign’s concerns about whether the petition received a fair and consistent review. Elections Alberta, however, told CBC News that it followed a clear process consistent with the Citizen Initiative Act and said procedural changes resulted from legislative changes or identified improvements and efficiencies; the agency declined further comment because the petition is now before the courts.

Lund’s requested moratorium would cover new coal development approvals, expansions and exploration while the legal dispute continues, and he is also asking the province for a more transparent review of existing approvals and a meeting to discuss protections for headwaters, fisheries and ranchlands. The broader fight over coal development in the Rockies has now become intertwined with questions about Alberta’s citizen-initiative system and the administration of petition verification. The court application asks for Elections Alberta’s decision to be quashed and the initiative declared successful, or alternatively sent back to the chief electoral officer for reconsideration. Until the court rules, Elections Alberta’s determination that the petition failed remains in effect, while Lund and Water Not Coal continue pressing both the environmental case for a pause and their procedural challenge to how the signatures were assessed.